[Insight-developers] RE: Complex vs f2c.h, "real" symbol conflicts in gcc 2.95

[Lorensen, William E (Research)]

Done!

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad King [mailto:brad.king at kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 4:28 PM
To: Lorensen, William E (Research)
Cc: Gaetan Lehmann; William A. Hoffman; insight-developers at itk.org; Luis
Ibanez
Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] RE: Complex vs f2c.h, "real" symbol
conflicts in gcc 2.95


Brad King wrote:
> Gaetan Lehmann wrote:
> 
>> If you edit all that code, won't it break building with system vxl ?
> 
> 
> Good point.  We'd have to contribute this "fix" back to vxl.  I'll bring 
> it up with them, but meanwhile does anyone have another suggestion?

On second thought this is not actually a vxl problem.  No where is the 
f2c header actually included by the netlib header.  It is just an 
internal implementation detail in source files where they deal with this 
problem already.  This is a problem for ITK only in code that includes 
f2c.h, which is a few .cxx files.  I had not realized this before.

Bill, I think your #define solution in those few FEM .cxx files is the 
way to go.  Please commit those changes.

Thanks,
-Brad