[Insight-developers] Const Missing in inputs for Process Object

[Bill Lorensen]

In place filters are coming shortly... Not sure what the const impact will be,

Bill

At 11:32 AM 3/23/02 -0500, Will Schroeder wrote:
>Hi Luis-
>
>I think this is the right thing to do, except for maybe in-place filters that we'll add at some point. Good luck, this might be a can of worms.
>
>Will
>
>
>At 11:23 AM 3/23/2002 -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>The array of inputs for Process Object is not const-correct.
>>
>>In principle there is no reason for a filter to modify its input
>>so the input should be stored as ConstSmartPointers.
>>
>>Currently this is done using just SmartPointers.
>>
>>This constness-defect is propagated through all the Filters
>>which  basically means that you cannot pass a const image
>>as input to any filter.      :-/
>>
>>Does anybody see a conflict in making the array of m_Inputs
>>in itk::ProcessObject   an array of SmartConstPointers   ?
>>
>>
>>  Luis
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Insight-developers mailing list
>>Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
>>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers