[Insight-developers] Const Missing in inputs for Process Object

[Will Schroeder]

Hi Luis-

I think this is the right thing to do, except for maybe in-place filters 
that we'll add at some point. Good luck, this might be a can of worms.

Will


At 11:23 AM 3/23/2002 -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The array of inputs for Process Object is not const-correct.
>
>In principle there is no reason for a filter to modify its input
>so the input should be stored as ConstSmartPointers.
>
>Currently this is done using just SmartPointers.
>
>This constness-defect is propagated through all the Filters
>which  basically means that you cannot pass a const image
>as input to any filter.      :-/
>
>Does anybody see a conflict in making the array of m_Inputs
>in itk::ProcessObject   an array of SmartConstPointers   ?
>
>
>   Luis
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers