[Insight-developers] Re: [Insight-developers]CMakeLists.txt changes : USE_FLTK & USE_VTK

[Luis Ibanez]

The only reason why I was removing the cache was because
the FLTK variables for paths were marked as "ADVANCED"
and now are not (so the user is not required now to check the
"Advanced" option in order to set these paths) and the
FLTK_WRAP_UI variable is now marked as "INTERNAL",
so users will now see it at all.

Bill Hoffman, just gave me some hints about how to avoid to remove
the Cache. I'm doing these changes, so you will *not* have to delete
the cache now.

It should be enough to run CMake and to go through the process of
selecting "USE_FLTK" and/or "USE_VTK", then select whether
you want to build: Auxiliary, FltkImageViewer, Examples....etc.

NOTE that now, if you select to build an example that requires FLTK
but "USE_FLTK" has not been selected or some of its components
(headers/libraries/fluid) have not been found, the example will just be
ignored, no error message will be produced.

Do we want to have such messages ?
They are quite easy to add...


Luis


==========================================

Lorensen, William E (CRD) wrote:

>Our test platforms all rerun cmake, but do not remove the cache. Why do we have to do that?
>
>Bill
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Luis Ibanez [mailto:luis.ibanez@kitware.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 8:40 AM
>To: Bill Lorensen
>Cc: Insight Developers
>Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] itkDeformableTest
>
>
>Bill,
>
>Sorry about that, the new pair of CMake variables
>is biases toward "not building" rather than trying
>to build when something is missing.
>
>I'm checking in the rest of the CMakeLists.txt in a
>couple of minutes.
>
>This will require that somebody run CMake by hand
>again in all the platforms (removing the Cache first).
>
>The starting sequence is now to decide if the particular
>platform is going to use FLTK and/or VTK. This is
>indicated by the "USE_VTK" and "USE_FLTK" variables.
>
>My apologies for the inconviniences...
>
>(I'll look in to the crashing test too)
>
>Luis
>
>
>=========================
>
>Bill Lorensen wrote:
>
>>Luis,
>>The subject test started crashing after your changes yesterday. You can look at the Continuous
>>
>builds and see when it started to crash.
>
>>Nightlies did not run last night. I kicked them off by hand. But Continuous is running...
>>
>>Bill
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Insight-developers mailing list
>>Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
>>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers@public.kitware.com
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>