[Insight-developers] itk::Index (signed / unsigned) long

[Miller, James V (CRD)]

Yup.

-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Ibanez [mailto:ibanez at cs.unc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:36 AM
To: insight-developers at public.kitware.com
Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] itk::Index (signed / unsigned) long


Hi,

Seems that it makes sense to have signed quantities as index elements.

Another advantage (of signed) is to being able to chech for <0 when
counting down in for loops.  [Stephen].

I'd already made a check in of itkIndex.h with "unsinged long" types.

Should I revert it ?


Luis



_______________________________________________
Insight-developers mailing list
Insight-developers at public.kitware.com
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers