[Ctk-developers] Fwd: [mitk-users] MITK with Latest CTK - problem with DCMTK

Mon May 20 23:02:23 UTC 2013

For reference, a solution has been proposed:
https://github.com/commontk/CTK/issues/329
It should be merged shortly.

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Sascha Zelzer
<s.zelzer at dkfz-heidelberg.de>wrote:

>  Hi JC,
>
> Did you have time to have a look at the broken support for the official
> DCMTK snapshot inside CTK? If I remember correctly, we settled on the
> decision to support the latest official DCMTK snapshot together with the
> patched versions of DCMTK contained in the commontk Github repositories
> (eventually by "ifdef"s  in the CTK code).
>
> As Marco pointed out in his E-Mail, it looks like your merge containing
> changes to the FindDCMTK.cmake script broke the support for the DCMTK
> snapshot...
>
> It would be great to solve this issue before the Hackfest.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sascha
>
>
> On 04/19/2013 02:40 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>  I don't know which change or who did these changes. But if we can find
> out, I could provide guidance so that we can add so configure check in
> order to make the feature introspection of DCMTK robust. That way, we would
> be able to include / exclude part of the CTKDCMTK library appropriately.
>
>  Thanks
> Jc
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Clarkson, Matt <m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>wrote:
>
>>  Hi there CTK-ers,
>>
>>  please can anyone help me out with a CTK / DCMTK problem?  It looks to
>> me like recent changes to CTK stop CTK working with the official DCMTK
>> snapshots which are used in MITK.
>> Is that right?
>>
>>  If anyone can shed light on the way forward, Im happy to try and help
>> here.
>>
>>  Thanks
>>
>>  Matt
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>  *From: *Marco Nolden <m.nolden at dkfz-heidelberg.de>
>>  *Subject: **Re: [mitk-users] MITK with Latest CTK - problem with DCMTK*
>>  *Date: *13 April 2013 22:38:37 BST
>>  *To: *"Clarkson, Matt" <m.clarkson at ucl.ac.uk>
>>  *Cc: *mitk-users <mitk-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> MITK's super build is using dcmtk-3.6.1_20120222, but there is a newer
>> snapshot here [1] and from a quick look through the Changes we could
>> upgrade if it compiles with MITK. If you like to try it you could replace
>> the URL in CMakeExternals/DCMTK.cmake (and remove or adapt the URL_MD5
>> line).
>>
>> I'm not sure though that the CTK change you mention will work with that
>> snapshot. CTK by default uses a forked version of DCMTK and there has been
>> some activity lately. IIRC we agreed that CTK _should_ always build with
>> the official DCMTK snapshots as well, but I'm afraid that doesn't get
>> tested regularly. So if that is broken we should contact JC if the changes
>> can be made in a compatible way.
>>
>> If you could confirm that MITK builds with the newer snapshot we could
>> upgrade this on our side. Unfortunately I can't test it myself at the
>> moment.
>>
>> Upgrading the CTK version can be more tricky, Sascha could maybe comment
>> on that. If you are just interested in the slider tick change, we could
>> also use a special version, did that before.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> [1]:
>> http://dicom.offis.de/download/dcmtk/snapshot/dcmtk-3.6.1_20121102.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.2013 21:06, schrieb Clarkson, Matt:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Following the merging of CTK issue #313 to CTK master (CTK commit
>> 099a88bb24), I then tried to update my MITK to compile with this version of
>> CTK, so I could pick up Miklos's new slider tick interval.
>> However, in the CTK master branch, commit 52d9539f5e, which is 3 before
>> the latest, causes CTK to not build using the DCMTK version that MITK is
>> using.
>>
>> So, it looks to me like MITK will need to consider upgrading DCMTK before
>> they can move to the latest CTK, which is the reason I post here, instead
>> of the CTK mailing list.
>>
>> However, I don't really understand what the reason for the CTK change is,
>> or why CTK has a different fork of DCMTK, or what exactly is the version of
>> DCMTK that MITK is using - dcmtk-3.6.1_20120222.tar.gz, so Im a bit stuck.
>>
>> Can anyone in MITK-land shed a light on a way forward?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
>> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
>> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
>> Employer Resources Portal
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> mitk-users mailing list
>> mitk-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ctk-developers mailing list
>> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
>> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
> +1 919 869 8849
>
>
>

-- 
+1 919 869 8849
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20130520/48f3226b/attachment.htm>