[Ctk-developers] DICOM Application Hosting / Sophia-Antipolis Hackfest

[Steve Pieper]

Hi Sascha -

There's a skeleton hackfest page here - feel free to flesh it out with more
project info:

http://www.commontk.org/index.php/CTK-Hackfest-Nov-2011

thanks,
Steve


On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Sascha Zelzer
<s.zelzer at dkfz-heidelberg.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Larry for pointing out DVTk. Reusing or extending an existing
> validation framework should definitely be considered. It seems that DVTk is
> Windows only (even tied to Visual Studio as an IDE) but I will check it out
> in more detail.
>
> If anybody else knows of a validation framework which would suit our needs,
> I'd be happy to hear about it.
>
> I will start adding names of people who expressed their interest in working
> on app hosting during the hackfest on the Wiki, if that's okay.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sascha
>
> On 09/10/2011 09:13 PM, Tarbox, Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Regarding conformance testing, many people used DVTK to test conformance
>> against the DICOM standard (see http://www.dvtk.com).  Would it be
>> appropriate to extend DVTK with Application Hosting testing, instead of
>> rolling our own test framework?  We might get broader user acceptance that
>> way.
>>
>> Lawrence
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctk-developers-bounces@**commontk.org<ctk-developers-bounces at commontk.org>[mailto:
>> ctk-developers-**bounces at commontk.org<ctk-developers-bounces at commontk.org>]
>> On Behalf Of Sascha Zelzer
>> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:09 AM
>> To: ctk-developers at commontk.org
>> Subject: [Ctk-developers] DICOM Application Hosting / Sophia-Antipolis
>> Hackfest
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> During the last weeks - with the next hackfest in mind - I was thinking
>> about how to advance the state of our DICOM Part 19 implementation.
>> Using the current mails about this topic as a motivator, I'd like to get a
>> little organized up front.
>>
>> First of all, I would like to know how many people are interested in
>> working on this topic during the hackfest (I'm sure Benoit is in ;-) ).
>> Maybe we can also identify other topics so people can get a little
>> organized before the hackfest.
>>
>> For the DICOM Application Hosting, I would like to see something in the
>> direction of a "conformance test suite". Meaning, some tools which make
>> testing and diagnosing of our own implementation and others far easier.
>> This could drive our work on implementing more of the specs and help
>> others check "DICOM Part 19 conformance".
>>
>> If people are in line with these ideas, I would start thinking about the
>> test set-up itself, such that we can implement specific tests (state
>> transitions, data exchange tests, etc.) during the hackfest which could in
>> parallel guide our implementation efforts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sascha
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Ctk-developers mailing list
>> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
>> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-**developers<http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers>
>>
>> ______________________________**__
>>
>> The material in this message is private and may contain Protected
>> Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be
>> advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any
>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
>> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
>> notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-**developers<http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/ctk-developers/attachments/20110911/f7e7ab01/attachment.htm>