[Ctk-developers] DICOM Application Hosting / Sophia-Antipolis Hackfest

[Sascha Zelzer]

Hi,

Thanks to Larry for pointing out DVTk. Reusing or extending an existing 
validation framework should definitely be considered. It seems that DVTk 
is Windows only (even tied to Visual Studio as an IDE) but I will check 
it out in more detail.

If anybody else knows of a validation framework which would suit our 
needs, I'd be happy to hear about it.

I will start adding names of people who expressed their interest in 
working on app hosting during the hackfest on the Wiki, if that's okay.

Thanks,

Sascha

On 09/10/2011 09:13 PM, Tarbox, Lawrence wrote:
> Regarding conformance testing, many people used DVTK to test conformance against the DICOM standard (see http://www.dvtk.com).  Would it be appropriate to extend DVTK with Application Hosting testing, instead of rolling our own test framework?  We might get broader user acceptance that way.
>
> Lawrence
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctk-developers-bounces at commontk.org [mailto:ctk-developers-bounces at commontk.org] On Behalf Of Sascha Zelzer
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:09 AM
> To: ctk-developers at commontk.org
> Subject: [Ctk-developers] DICOM Application Hosting / Sophia-Antipolis Hackfest
>
> Hi guys,
>
> During the last weeks - with the next hackfest in mind - I was thinking about how to advance the state of our DICOM Part 19 implementation.
> Using the current mails about this topic as a motivator, I'd like to get a little organized up front.
>
> First of all, I would like to know how many people are interested in working on this topic during the hackfest (I'm sure Benoit is in ;-) ).
> Maybe we can also identify other topics so people can get a little organized before the hackfest.
>
> For the DICOM Application Hosting, I would like to see something in the direction of a "conformance test suite". Meaning, some tools which make testing and diagnosing of our own implementation and others far easier.
> This could drive our work on implementing more of the specs and help others check "DICOM Part 19 conformance".
>
> If people are in line with these ideas, I would start thinking about the test set-up itself, such that we can implement specific tests (state transitions, data exchange tests, etc.) during the hackfest which could in parallel guide our implementation efforts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sascha
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers
>
> ________________________________
>
> The material in this message is private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.