[Ctk-developers] COPYRIGHT & LICENSING

[Steve Pieper]

Hi Sascha -

Yes, I think Apache 2 is the consensus for most of the code.

The only outstanding question is if we will need to have some of the 
Qt-based in an independent LGPL library.  I think that decision could be 
made at the hackfest when we can all focus and discuss all the issues 
face to face.

-Steve

On Apr/23/10 11:42 AM, Sascha Zelzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to add a few new files to the CTK plugin-framework branch and I'd
> like to use the "correct" copyright / licensing information. Our
> discussion somehow ended without a clear result and most files in the
> repository state that they are BSD style licensed and refer to a
> non-existing LICENSE.txt file.
>
> I understand that this decision is not to be treated lightly, but we
> need to come to a conclusion. Personally, I would vote for Apache 2.0
> because of the clear statements concerning patents.
>
> Best,
> Sascha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ctk-developers mailing list
> Ctk-developers at commontk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ctk-developers