[CMake] Secret precompiled header support?

[David Cole]

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Eric Noulard <eric.noulard at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2012/5/15 Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists at gmail.com>:
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave at boostpro.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> For me, no.  I'm trying to make a transition to CMake in a community
> >> where this is being seen as a problematic limitation.
> >
> >
> > I actually was reading over the boost modularization discussion, but I
> > didn't spend enough time there to understand what this whole process is
> for.
> > I'm assuming this is being setup so users can download pieces of boost
> > individually and only use the parts they want. I'm glad that Boost is
> making
> > a real effort to use CMake. I think such an influential community being
> > involved with CMake will help push Kitware to realize how serious people
> are
> > taking their products and maybe they'll make a move to "professionalize"
> > them.
>
> I could not resist a troll like that.
> No offense but saying that CMake has to address such and such
> limitation/weirdiness seems ok to me,
> but going down to infer that no "serious" people do currently use
> CMake is a little hard to read...
>
> ...and... I'm not speaking for myself since
> I'm not considering myself as a serious guy anyway :-]
>
> All that said I can witness that serious patches are more than usually
> welcome :-)
>
> --
> Erk
> Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie --
> http://www.le-message.org
> --
>
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>


I can't resist either: how much would you pay for a "Professional Edition"
of CMake?

:-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20120515/f3bfd9df/attachment.htm>