[CMake] Need advice for unit test structure

[Robert Dailey]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden) <
> poppy at lindenlab.com> wrote:
>
>> Robert Dailey wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have unit tests that require failure to compile in order to be
>>> successful? If you do, placing these particular unit tests in a project with
>>> other tests that must compile to succeed will interrupt the process,
>>> depending on the order of compilation.
>>>
>>
>> I don't have that particular case, but I could support it. With my
>> scenario each test is its own binary. This is normally messy, but because
>> tests are built in sub-projects it's not noticeable in the main build. Each
>> group of tests looks like one test in the main build, but are completely
>> separate in the sub-build.
>
>
> Ah, I see now. It was not immediately obvious to me what your code was
> doing. I didn't notice it was making each CPP file basically compile itself
> (Which is still just an assumption).
>
> Where is the implementation for "set_source_files_properties"?
>

Oh, duh! It's a built-in function :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20090409/703c3781/attachment-0001.htm>