[CMake] Need advice for unit test structure

[Robert Dailey]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden) <
poppy at lindenlab.com> wrote:

> Robert Dailey wrote:
>
>> Do you have unit tests that require failure to compile in order to be
>> successful? If you do, placing these particular unit tests in a project with
>> other tests that must compile to succeed will interrupt the process,
>> depending on the order of compilation.
>>
>
> I don't have that particular case, but I could support it. With my scenario
> each test is its own binary. This is normally messy, but because tests are
> built in sub-projects it's not noticeable in the main build. Each group of
> tests looks like one test in the main build, but are completely separate in
> the sub-build.


Ah, I see now. It was not immediately obvious to me what your code was
doing. I didn't notice it was making each CPP file basically compile itself
(Which is still just an assumption).

Where is the implementation for "set_source_files_properties"?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20090409/dd1b7212/attachment.htm>