[CMake-Promote] Generic installation instructions
Alexander Neundorf
a.neundorf-work at gmx.net
Tue Jan 10 14:28:13 EST 2006
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "Brandon J. Van Every" <bvanevery at gmail.com>
> An: CMake-Promote <cmake-promote at cmake.org>
> Betreff: Re: [CMake-Promote] Generic installation instructions
> Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:46:48 -0800
>
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> >
> >I'd say INSTALL-CMAKE.txt or INSTALL-CMake.txt is good. Or how about
> >InstallCMake.txt, whoich is even more in line with the rest of the
> >cmake files ?
> >
> >
> I had thought that wouldn't alphebatize with the GNU Autoconf INSTALL.
> But let me test that theory. Hm, on Windows, alphebatization isn't
> case sensitive. How about on Unix?
Well, it would follow directly after "INSTALL".
> Glitches: CMake already generates an install_manifest.txt. gccxml has
> a script file called cmake_install.cmake. Maybe a different word
That's the file which is created if the CMakeLists.txt contains
INSTALL_XXX() commands.
> choice
> is in order. For instance, CMakeHOWTO.txt, CMakeInstructions.txt, or
> CMakeHelp.txt. Maybe alphebatization isn't the highest good, if the
> price is name collisions with other "install" stuff. Hm, still,
> INSTALL* would be much better for getting people to dump their Autoconf
> INSTALL file. Grr. What about InstallWithCMake.txt? Looks nice, but
> is it too long for command line hackers?
Command line hackers usually have a shell with filename completion I'd
say.
Bye
Alex
--
DSL-Aktion wegen großer Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 verlängert:
GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
More information about the CMake-Promote
mailing list