[Cdash] Emma coverage

[Nils Gladitz]

On 10.04.2015 18:43, Zack Galbreath wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Nils Gladitz <nilsgladitz at gmail.com 
> <mailto:nilsgladitz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I mean wouldn't emma currently try to generate the same .json file
>     for both classes?
>     Since even though they are in different packages they would
>     currently have the same <Class>.java.json filename written into
>     the same output directory.
>
>     Hence one overwriting the other and the former being lost?
>
>
>
> That makes sense too.  I guess we'll have to do something a bit more 
> careful on the Java side.

Does this look sensible?
https://github.com/ngladitz/emma/commit/cba7bad1be36d5e135f2bd02f498d35943562801

I hope it isn't too obvious that I don't do much java :)

Nils
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cdash/attachments/20150410/b16fe66b/attachment-0001.htm>