<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10.04.2015 18:43, Zack Galbreath
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANgkMA78VESnBQDcbRmciwrdserJFrKPCa4bn=6EMFs8NcxQKw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:02 PM,
Nils Gladitz <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:nilsgladitz@gmail.com" target="_blank"
onclick="window.open('https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&tf=1&to=nilsgladitz@gmail.com&cc=&bcc=&su=&body=','_blank');return
false;">nilsgladitz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">I mean wouldn't emma
currently try to generate the same .json file for both
classes?<br>
Since even though they are in different packages they
would currently have the same <Class>.java.json
filename written into the same output directory.<br>
<br>
Hence one overwriting the other and the former being
lost?</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">That makes sense too. I guess we'll
have to do something a bit more careful on the Java side.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Does this look sensible?<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/ngladitz/emma/commit/cba7bad1be36d5e135f2bd02f498d35943562801">https://github.com/ngladitz/emma/commit/cba7bad1be36d5e135f2bd02f498d35943562801</a><br>
<br>
I hope it isn't too obvious that I don't do much java :)<br>
<br>
Nils<br>
</body>
</html>