[Cdash] No email on failed continuous builds
bill.hoffman at kitware.com
Mon Jun 23 13:48:34 UTC 2008
Trevor Kellaway wrote:
>> I just realized what you are saying (coffee is kicking in :)).
>> We should apply the same tagging strategy for the patches. Meaning we
>> tag and release 1.0.0 and update the branch version to 1.0.1
>> and release 1.0.2 when we have enough fixes.
> OK, out of interest when working on a theoretical 1.0.3 where are you
> going to do this, in the head of Release-1-0 ? This is OK, but I think
> there should have been a Release-1-0-0 which is treated as read-only,
> otherwise it isn't possible to discover what was in the original
This should be done like what we do with CMake.
Working version is odd numbered:
Release version is even:
When I create a new release I do the following:
1. create a branch CMake-2-6
2. debug the branch. When it is ready, create a read only tag CMake-2-6-1.
CMake-2-6-1 can never change at this point.
3. put bug fixes on the CMake-2-6 branch until ready for CMake-2-6-2
4. When ready create a new tag CMake-2-6-2.
More information about the CDash