Kitware Scene Graph Meeting April 6, 2010 KHQ: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
2. Description by Julien Finet at KRS of requirements for ParaView for transforms, which led to a description by Luis of transforms in KWScene. The possibility of reusing the IGSTK spatial relationships model, where every object is connected to a parent was evoked. IGSTK uses rigid transforms, which could be expanded here. He presented two potentially conflictint use-cases, namely a large collection of small objects, such as the Computer Vision group's requirement, or a small collection of large objects, as is the case for JHU. | 2. Description by Julien Finet at KRS of requirements for ParaView for transforms, which led to a description by Luis of transforms in KWScene. The possibility of reusing the IGSTK spatial relationships model, where every object is connected to a parent was evoked. IGSTK uses rigid transforms, which could be expanded here. He presented two potentially conflictint use-cases, namely a large collection of small objects, such as the Computer Vision group's requirement, or a small collection of large objects, as is the case for JHU. | ||
3. Amitha presented a Computer Vision group usecase in more detail, which would involve a reprojection on a 3D space onto where an image came from on the ground. Also a possibility of affixing avatars to 3D space. A rapid refresh rate, 30 Hz, would be needed. | |||
4. | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 6 April 2010
Kitware Scene Graph Meeting April 6, 2010 KHQ
1. Presentation by Michel of slides briefly describing JHU and existing Kitware requirements for KWScene. [1]
2. Description by Julien Finet at KRS of requirements for ParaView for transforms, which led to a description by Luis of transforms in KWScene. The possibility of reusing the IGSTK spatial relationships model, where every object is connected to a parent was evoked. IGSTK uses rigid transforms, which could be expanded here. He presented two potentially conflictint use-cases, namely a large collection of small objects, such as the Computer Vision group's requirement, or a small collection of large objects, as is the case for JHU.
3. Amitha presented a Computer Vision group usecase in more detail, which would involve a reprojection on a 3D space onto where an image came from on the ground. Also a possibility of affixing avatars to 3D space. A rapid refresh rate, 30 Hz, would be needed.
4.
