Difference between revisions of "ITK/Tcons/Agendas/2012 04 27"

From KitwarePublic
< ITK‎ | Tcons‎ | Agendas
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 48: Line 48:
*RemoteModules
*RemoteModules
**http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/5275/
**http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/5275/
**http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Policy_and_Procedures_for_Adding_Remote_Modules
*Dimension Typedefs
*Dimension Typedefs
**http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/5299/
**http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/5299/

Latest revision as of 14:07, 27 April 2012

How to Join the Tcon

Number to Call

Please be patient, due to some unforeseen circumstances, the call may not start on time...

  • 1-800-728-9607 (in the US) or
  • +1 9139049873 (international)
  • access code 6815251

Webex

Status

Release Schedule

ITK-v4.2

  • June 2012
  • All New Code should be in Gerrit by May 21th, preferable before, to allow time to review and revise.
    • Reviewers should plan time to review this week
  • Feature Freeze May 28, 2012
  • Weekly Release candidates only to address bug and clean dashboard
    • ITKv4.2.0rc1 June 1st, 2012
    • ITKv4.2.0rc2 June 15st, 2012
    • ITKv4.2.0rc3 June 22nd, 2012

* ITKv4.2.0 release June 30th, 2012

Dashboard

Gerrit

  • There are several topics to discuss

Other Isssues

  • SimpleITK's need for VectorImage Support on Gradient Image Filters
  • Watershed ImageFilters issues of long long pixel types
  • How should SimpleITK's need to change filters to make them more robust to pixel types and VectorImages be handled after 4.2

Review JIRA

  • JIRA is down
  • issues.itk.org

Goal

  • Specifically look through bugs that are critical and should be promptly address.
  • Discuss policy on meaning of Priority. Should a certain priority indicate that a patch should be applied to the release branch? Should a certain level of priority always be addressed before the next release?
    • Blocker
    • Critical
    • Major

1