Agenda&Status 061606: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Status of release 2.8 | * Status of release 2.8 | ||
* CMake 2.2 required | ** Any objections for tagging a patch: 2.8.1 ? | ||
** | ** Then we create tarballs. | ||
* Dashboard Status | |||
** Problems in Midworld: Review directory created a Distributions library but missed the link dependencies with ITKCommon. | |||
** Muse Mistery !! link problems (any hints ?) | |||
** CMake 2.2 required | |||
*** Some dashboard machines need conversion | |||
*** Some FLTK issues in Insight Applications (may or may not be related to CMake 2.2) | |||
** Code Coverage ? | |||
*** Has not been submitted for a while | |||
*** Should we set it up in another machine ? | |||
* Collecting ideas for next year maintenance | * Collecting ideas for next year maintenance | ||
* Changing rules for contributing code to ITK | * Changing rules for contributing code to ITK | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 11 June 2007
Agenda
- Status of release 2.8
- Any objections for tagging a patch: 2.8.1 ?
- Then we create tarballs.
- Dashboard Status
- Problems in Midworld: Review directory created a Distributions library but missed the link dependencies with ITKCommon.
- Muse Mistery !! link problems (any hints ?)
- CMake 2.2 required
- Some dashboard machines need conversion
- Some FLTK issues in Insight Applications (may or may not be related to CMake 2.2)
- Code Coverage ?
- Has not been submitted for a while
- Should we set it up in another machine ?
- Collecting ideas for next year maintenance
- Changing rules for contributing code to ITK
- Create a CVS Sandbox ?
- Require a single review ?
- Explicit Instantiation with ExplicitITK: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Proposals:Explicit_Instantiation#Explicit_ITK
