Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

From KitwarePublic
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Question of Bulid VTK.)
m (Reverted edits by Mm1827 (talk) to last revision by Oalabi)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
i dont understand your question entirely. but if you want to view the dataset in a wireframe mode, just press 'w' in the visualisation window
hi
i have many problems in the installation of VTK with visual studio 2005
i can not execute the example of vtk


== volume average with paraview ==
Hi there


hello everybody
First you need to know whether VS 2005 is installed correctly or not.


I'd like to konw if it's possible to calculate a volume average in paraview.
So, develop a simple command line code with VS 2005.
I had all the data point value defined in the volume.


thanks
Good luck
Foruzan


== QVTK cmakelist ==
== PV 3.10 built from git trunk: gcc and glibcxx 3.4.14 referenced from separate directories ==


I tried to use the QVTK package given with vtk 5.0 but i seem to be lost.
In attempting to build ParaView 3.10.0 from git trunk I ran into the problem of finding glibcxx 3.4.14. Apparently, when setting CMAKE options, CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER and CMAKE_C_COMPILER were both pointing to /usr/local/bin... while the required standard libraries were located in /usr/lib64/bin...
i m asking for help.
when i cmake the package it gives me an error on the cmakelist.txt.
could somebody be nice enough to post a cmakelists that actually works.


== NETCDF? ==
Does make or cmake determine where the standard libraries are? This is a problem with cmake, or was I supposed to know where the standard libraries were?
 
While it did properly locate the preferred compiler, this standard library discrepancy was a challenge to figure out. Does anyone have any feedback regarding what exactly is going on
 
 
Hi
I am looking around for open source parallel vis programs for unstructured grid 3d+time data. I need to make sections and volume renders from model output. FVCOM is a finite volume coastal ocean model.
 
The output is NETCDF, I saw this file type mentioned briefly under HDF4, but it does not seem to be one of the major input files supported by paraview? can I make it work? How hard would it be?
 
What kind of unstructured grid data is allowed in paraview? Ocean models are hell because velocity is at cell centers, tracers are at nodes and cell edges, infact I think we have data at five different locations specified by the nodes and conectivity. Can paraview handle this?
 
thoughts and suggestions?
 
D
 
== Question of Bulid VTK. ==
 
I use Visual C++ 6.0 to open VTK, and I already trans the VTK to VC project with CMake,But when I Bulid the project , the lib file bulid ok, But when bulid the project CommonCxxTests it have an link error. It says can not found debug.obj, The Error Code is :
--------------------Configuration: CommonCxxTests - Win32 Debug--------------------
Linking...
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file "vtk-5.0.1\bin\.\Debug.obj"
Error executing link.exe.
 
ALL_BUILD - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
 
 
I go to vtk-5.0.1\bin\.\ , there's no file called debug.obj , But I can not found the setting of this file in link option.
 
Can anyone help me . Thanks very much!

Latest revision as of 14:00, 25 July 2011

hi i have many problems in the installation of VTK with visual studio 2005 i can not execute the example of vtk

Hi there

First you need to know whether VS 2005 is installed correctly or not.

So, develop a simple command line code with VS 2005.

Good luck Foruzan

PV 3.10 built from git trunk: gcc and glibcxx 3.4.14 referenced from separate directories

In attempting to build ParaView 3.10.0 from git trunk I ran into the problem of finding glibcxx 3.4.14. Apparently, when setting CMAKE options, CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER and CMAKE_C_COMPILER were both pointing to /usr/local/bin... while the required standard libraries were located in /usr/lib64/bin...

Does make or cmake determine where the standard libraries are? This is a problem with cmake, or was I supposed to know where the standard libraries were? While it did properly locate the preferred compiler, this standard library discrepancy was a challenge to figure out. Does anyone have any feedback regarding what exactly is going on