ITK/Release 4/SpatialObjects/2010.11.18-Meeting: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
< ITK | Release 4 | SpatialObjects
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
** One option is to implement a '''FEMMeshSpatialObject''' and | ** One option is to implement a '''FEMMeshSpatialObject''' and | ||
*** a Reader Writer for it. | *** a Reader Writer for it. | ||
**** We can take the IO code from the Solver in the registration framework. | **** We can take the IO code from the Solver in the registration framework (Code/Numerics/FEM/itkFEMSolver.cxx) | ||
Revision as of 16:16, 18 November 2010
Spatial Objects
Attendees
- Arnaud Gelas
- Vincent Magnotta
- Luis Ibanez
Potential Use for FEM
- A potential FEMMeshSpatialObject could be created
- Still a "FEMMesh" must be created
- How much refactoring is needed in Numeric/FEM
- IO is a critical need for FEM.
- One option is to implement a FEMMeshSpatialObject and
- a Reader Writer for it.
- We can take the IO code from the Solver in the registration framework (Code/Numerics/FEM/itkFEMSolver.cxx)
- a Reader Writer for it.
- One option is to implement a FEMMeshSpatialObject and
