ITK/Release 4/SpatialObjects/2010.11.18-Meeting: Difference between revisions
From KitwarePublic
< ITK | Release 4 | SpatialObjects
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Potential Use for FEM == | == Potential Use for FEM == | ||
* A potential FEMMeshSpatialObject could be created | * A potential '''FEMMeshSpatialObject''' could be created | ||
** Still a "FEMMesh" must be created | ** Still a "FEMMesh" must be created | ||
* How much refactoring is needed in Numeric/FEM | * How much refactoring is needed in Numeric/FEM | ||
* IO is a critical need for FEM. | * IO is a critical need for FEM. | ||
** One option is to implement a FEMMeshSpatialObject and | ** One option is to implement a '''FEMMeshSpatialObject''' and | ||
*** a Reader Writer for it. | *** a Reader Writer for it. | ||
**** We can take the IO code from the Solver in the registration framework. | |||
Revision as of 16:13, 18 November 2010
Spatial Objects
Attendees
- Arnaud Gelas
- Vincent Magnotta
- Luis Ibanez
Potential Use for FEM
- A potential FEMMeshSpatialObject could be created
- Still a "FEMMesh" must be created
- How much refactoring is needed in Numeric/FEM
- IO is a critical need for FEM.
- One option is to implement a FEMMeshSpatialObject and
- a Reader Writer for it.
- We can take the IO code from the Solver in the registration framework.
- a Reader Writer for it.
- One option is to implement a FEMMeshSpatialObject and
