[Rtk-users] Result from SART is worse than from FDK

[Staude, Andreas]

Hello RTk-users,

I try to use the SART algorithm, but the results are worse than those
obtained with FDK (see attached images).

The FDK result looks like expected, so I assume that I have the data
format and the reconstruction geometry set properly. For SART I used the 
same parameters and already tried with different values of lambda and 
niterations.

Does anyone have an idea what went wrong? Is there some kind of
smoothing or regularisation applied in the SART implementation?

Many thanks in advance!

Cheers,

Andreas


-- 

===============================================================
Dr. Andreas Staude
Fachbereich 8.5 "Mikro-ZfP", Computertomographie
BAM Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung
Unter den Eichen 87
D-12205 Berlin
Germany

Tel.: ++49 30 8104 4140
Fax:  ++49 30 8104 1837
===============================================================



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fdk.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 119717 bytes
Desc: fdk.jpg
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20131105/3ea53c92/attachment-0016.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sart.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 25084 bytes
Desc: sart.jpg
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/rtk-users/attachments/20131105/3ea53c92/attachment-0017.jpg>