[Paraview] ParaView 3.8 RC1 needs more elaborate FindHDF5.cmake

[Michael Jackson]

I'm not sure what version of CMake the HDF5-CMake project requires. I  
was coding all of my stuff to CMake 2.6 then the last time I pulled  
the HDF5-CMake sources there was the Cmake 2.8 Min requirement. So  
don't know.
___________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer       mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio


On Apr 28, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:

> And bear in mind that once I am confident enough to push git  
> nonsense to kitware and everywhere else, then I'll be upgrading the  
> hdf5 in paraview to 1.8
>
> And that is before paraview 3.10, it will be on the 3.8.x something  
> release.
>
> Actually Mike, doesn't our hdf5 require cmake 1.8 anyway?
>
> in which case we should make the cmake switch in paraview, I'd  
> forgotten about that.
>
> On the dev list, upgrading hdf5 was agreed, but the cmake change was  
> not.
>
> Comments?
>
> JB
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: paraview-bounces at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-bounces at paraview.org 
>> ]
>> On Behalf Of Dave Partyka
>> Sent: 28 April 2010 18:33
>> To: Michael Jackson
>> Cc: ParaView list
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] ParaView 3.8 RC1 needs more elaborate  
>> FindHDF5.cmake
>>
>> True, I can copy the CMake version onto the branch if that sounds
>> reasonable? Let me consult with my spiritual advisors first before  
>> I commit
>> to anything. ;-)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Michael Jackson
>> <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 	Right, In CMake 2.8.1, I Checked. I'll assume that you are NOT going
>> to switch the ParaView 3.8 branch from Cmake 2.6.x to CMake 2.8  
>> BEFORE it is
>> released which would be a pretty large last minute change.
>> 	 So basically, for the ParaView 3.8 branch this will be left  
>> unfixed?
>> I just need to know how I am going to formulate my work-around  
>> until PV 3.10
>> is released.
>> 	--
>> 	Mike Jackson
>>
>>
>> 	On Apr 28, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Dave Partyka wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 		There is a FindHDF5 that is built into CMake, I think 2.8, that
>> was re-written and vastly improved in the not so distant past. When  
>> we
>> switch VTK/ParaView to require CMake 2.8 we can remove the one in  
>> ParaView
>> which will then use the one included in CMake. I haven't gotten the  
>> go ahead
>> but it is something we will probably do very soon.
>>
>> 		On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Michael Jackson
>> <mike.jackson at bluequartz.net> wrote:
>> 		I am having a problem building ParaView against a prebuilt HDF5
>> library. I set the PARAVIEW_USE_SYSTEM_HDF5=ON during the initial  
>> CMake
>> Configuration. The problem is that FindHDF5.cmake that is included  
>> with
>> ParaView is pretty basic and can not find the HDF5 that is  
>> installed on my
>> system.
>>
>> 		 Can we possibly include a file with a bit more searching
>> capabilities? I have a candidate that I think will work (works with  
>> my
>> projects) or is there a way to over-ride the CMAKE_MODULE_PATH from  
>> the
>> command line?
>>
>> 		 This is on Windows with Visual Studio (64 bit if it really
>> matters)
>> 		___________________________________________________________
>> 		Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
>> 		Principal Software Engineer       mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
>> 		BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio
>>
>>
>>
>