[Paraview-developers] New git repo: reporting changed repo after only pull

[Dave Partyka]

You want to put it before ctest_update is called.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov>wrote:

>  I tried adding your execute_process after my call to ctest_update, but I
> don’t think it’s quite working.  The problem is that the submodule update
> command does not get run until after the ctest_update call returns, and by
> that time CTest has already determined that the update has failed.
>
> Where exactly should I be putting the execute_process?
>
> -Ken
>
>
>
> On 4/20/10 7:07 AM, "Dave Partyka" <dave.partyka at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> You're going to want to add something like this in your script for initial
> checkout:
>
>   execute_process(
>     COMMAND \"${CTEST_GIT_COMMAND}\" submodule init
>     WORKING_DIRECTORY \"${CTEST_SOURCE_DIRECTORY}\"
>     )
>
> And for each update you'll want:
>
>   execute_process(
>     COMMAND \"${CTEST_GIT_COMMAND}\" submodule update --recursive --
>     WORKING_DIRECTORY \"${CTEST_SOURCE_DIRECTORY}\"
>     )
>
> Also this will be handy:
>
> # Look for a GIT command-line client.
> if(NOT DEFINED CTEST_GIT_COMMAND)
> find_program(CTEST_GIT_COMMAND NAMES git git.cmd)
> endif()
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Dave Partyka <dave.partyka at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>
> I do not know if ctest knows how to update submodules automatically. I have
> it on my todo list to talk to Brad King about this for the same reason for
> updating the ParaView dashboards here at Kitware. I'll share what I find
> out.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov>
> wrote:
>
> Yes.  That seems to fix the problem.  However, is there a way to get ctest
> to run that after pulling?  Otherwise we’ll still get a bunch of errors in
> the dashboard.
>
> -Ken
>
>
>
> On 4/19/10 5:09 PM, "Dave Partyka" <dave.partyka at kitware.com <
> http://dave.partyka@kitware.com> > wrote:
>
> does 'git submodule update' help?
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov <
> http://kmorel@sandia.gov> > wrote:
>
> I noticed something odd when converting to the new git repositories today.
>  After only cloning the repository, setting up the modules, and then pulling
> (using the --rebase flag as described on the Wiki), status reports that I
> have made a change in my repository even though I have not.  Here is a
> terminal capture of a newly cloned ParaView repository (after modules and
> hooks are set up).
>
> kmorel2 0> git status
>                                /Users/kmorel/src/ParaView
> # On branch master
> nothing to commit (working directory clean)
> kmorel2 1> git pull --rebase
>                         /Users/kmorel/src/ParaView
> remote: Counting objects: 44, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (26/26), done.
> remote: Total 26 (delta 20), reused 0 (delta 0)
> Unpacking objects: 100% (26/26), done.
> From git://paraview.org/ParaView <http://paraview.org/ParaView>  <
> http://paraview.org/ParaView>
>    c880593..c5f3c07  master     -> origin/master
> First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
> Fast-forwarded master to c5f3c079ec12a1a85526a56e40147ded8089b7f0.
> kmorel2 0> git status
>                                /Users/kmorel/src/ParaView
> # On branch master
> # Changed but not updated:
> #   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
> #   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working
> directory)
> #
> #       modified:   VTK
> #
> no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
> kmorel2 1>
>                                           /Users/kmorel/src/ParaView
>
>
> Does anyone have a clue why git is reporting VTK as modified or how to fix
> it?  I first noticed this as I was testing my dashboards and saw that update
> was reporting errors.
>
> -Ken
>
>    ****      Kenneth Moreland
>     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> ***********
> *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>  <
> http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
> **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
>     ***      web:   http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org <http://Paraview-developers@paraview.org>
>
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>
>
>
>
>    ****      Kenneth Moreland
>     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> ***********
> *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov <http://kmorel@sandia.gov>
> **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
>     ***      web:   http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    ****      Kenneth Moreland
>     ***      Sandia National Laboratories
> ***********
> *** *** ***  email: kmorel at sandia.gov
> **  ***  **  phone: (505) 844-8919
>     ***      web:   http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20100422/e23cfe16/attachment-0001.htm>