[Insight-users] FC5 gcc 4.1.0 complex

[Karthik Krishnan]

Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:

>On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:46 -0500, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
>  
>
>>If I get to "make test" I'll report weather or not it worked. (As far as
>>that goes.)
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Well the build went fine but some tests did not pass.
>
>99% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 1087
>
>The following tests FAILED:
>        743 - ImageRegistration3Tcl (SEGFAULT)
>        744 - ImageRegistration4Tcl (SEGFAULT)
>        745 - ImageRegistration5Tcl (SEGFAULT)
>        995 - FFTDirectInverse2Test (Failed)
>Errors while running CTest
>
>This does not look good. TCL is obvious. That's what I was trying to
>wrap. FFT does not look good I know FFTs produce complex numbers. I did
>try to use the system FFT... 
>  
>
I don't think that had anything to do with the patch you applied. I 
realize that there isn't a single dashboard that tests the 
FFTDirectInverse2Test. I just turned FFT on the dashboard my machine 
submits and it fails.

Is your machine a 64 bit machine. I've noticed that these other 3 tests 
seem to fail on some 64 bit machines such as
http://www.itk.org/Testing/Sites/chiarugi.uiowa/Linux64-g++-3.4-dbg/20060327-0100-Nightly/Test.html
( ?? I don't have a 64 but machine ).

You should send the tar ball to Brad, brad.king at kitware.com (I presume 
you added support for your compiler in GCC_XML/Support/GCC/4.1) so he 
can add it to gccxml CVS.

>I don't really know what can be learned from this.
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-users mailing list
>Insight-users at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>  
>