[Insight-developers] ITK 3.2 : ITKDistributions library

[Jim Miller]

Luis,

I agree.  When we move items out of Review, this is our last opportunity to
change the code from an API, namespace, naming, or library perspective.

We need to document specific changes like this in the Release Notes.

Jim



On 2/24/07, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Now that we are moving the Distribution classes from
> the Review directory into Code/Numerics/Statistics,
> it seems redundant to have an ITKDistributions library.
>
> It is probably better to aggregate these classes into
> the existing ITKStatistics library.
>
> However, if we do this, those applications that may
> already be linking to a ITKDistributions library will
> have to remove it from their dependencies.  This may
> be a minor issue for Slicer.
>
> Since the classes were in the Review directory we are
> not subject to the backward compatibility policy there,
> so it will be just a matter of informing users that
> this library is no longer necessary.
>
>
>
>     Luis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-developers mailing list
> Insight-developers at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20070224/a3de3255/attachment.htm