[Insight-developers] Re: concept checking in blox classes

[Robert Tamburo]

Amy,

The second template parameter is redundant. I can work on a fix this week.

-Robert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Amy Squillacote" <amy.squillacote at kitware.com>
To: <rjtst21 at pitt.edu>; <dmshelto at andrew.cmu.edu>; <george at stetten.com>
Cc: <lorensen at crd.ge.com>; <insight-developers at itk.org>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: concept checking in blox classes


> Dear Robert and George,
>
> As you probably know, we recently started adding concept checking
> into ITK.  Our plan of action was described in this recent e-mail to
> the developers list:
>
http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/2006-February/007652.html.
>
> As you can see from this plan, we will need some help from the
> authors of the filters in order to determine the specific
> restrictions on the types over which the filters are intended to be
> instantiated.
>
> As part of this process, we just found in the class:
>
> itkBloxBoundaryProfileImageToBloxCoreAtomImageFilter
>
> that despite being templated over the image type and the dimension,
> it can only be instantiated when the dimension and the image
> dimension are both equal to 3.  We are wondering if this is the
> intended behavior or if this is a bug.  If this is the intended
> behavior, we are wondering why the second template parameter is needed.
>
> Please let us know what you think.
>
> - Amy
>
>