[IGSTK-Developers] Original Requirements Classified

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Brian,

1) We are probably in a good point for setting the requirements
    of the Scene and Viewer now that the prototype code has reached
    and stable state.


2) Your mapping of concepts from the bugTracker to the Wiki makes
    perfect sense.  Sorry that I missed to use a uniform naming.
    We could rename the bug categories (I'll have to double check
    with Andy, to see if this is possible without breaking the
    database).


  Luis



-----------------------
M. Brian Blake wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The original requirements have been classified based on our new requirements types.  This includes the original requirements contained in the bug tracker currently.
> A few notes.
> 
> 1. Not all requirements (i,e the initial viewer and scene requirements) are in the bug tracker.  We never decided to move those outstanding requirements into the tracker after the November meeting sparking the change to requirement types.
> 
> 2. The choices in bug tracker are a bit different than the requirements types on the WIKI.  I made the mapping as detailed below (e.g. WIKI name -> Name in BugTracker)
> 
> WIKI name -> Name in BugTracker
> Application Requirements -> Requirements
> Developer Standards ->  Style Guidelines
> Architecture Description -> Design Guidelines
> 
> 
> Hope the above makes sense. Feel free to take a look at the categorization in the bugtracker and we can discuss at the meeting today. 
> 
> -Brian
> 
> 
> M. Brian Blake, Ph.D
> Assistant Professor
> Georgetown University
> Washington, DC 20057
> mb7 at georgetown.edu
> http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~blakeb/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IGSTK-Developers mailing list
> IGSTK-Developers at public.kitware.com
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/igstk-developers
> 
>