[CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

[Robert Dailey]

I realize this is a feature but since I've provided the patch files that
implement this (attached to the bug below) I was hoping you wouldn't mind.
It's a small feature addition for source control bindings. Read more here:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12549

---------
Robert Dailey


On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just created a bug here:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12545
>
> The issue involves duplicate entries in the Add Remove Programs dialog in
> Windows 7 when installing upgrades for CMake using the installer. I'd like
> to see this cleaned up by the next release, as subsequent upgrades will
> surely only add more duplicated entries.
>
> ---------
> Robert Dailey
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:19 AM, David Cole <david.cole at kitware.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *NO* replies requested. Different technique this time. Please edit the
>> bug tracker directly. (Unless you have problems with the bug tracker:
>> if so, please feel free to reply here with your suggestions.)
>>
>> We are planning for CMake 2.8.7, aiming for a December release. We're
>> targeting Dec. 28, 2011 for releasing it, and in order to make that
>> happen we'll have to do an "rc1" by Dec. 7th or so... about 7 weeks
>> from now.
>>
>> If you have a particular issue that you think should be fixed for
>> inclusion in 2.8.7, please put it on the roadmap yourself by the end
>> of next week, Fri. Oct. 28th. To do so, edit the bug at
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug and set the "Target Version" field to
>> "CMake 2.8.7" - that will make it appear on the roadmap page (
>> http://www.cmake.org/Bug/roadmap_page.php?version_id=89 ). Also: add a
>> note saying why it's important to you, or even add a patch that fixes
>> and documents and tests it if you're able to.
>>
>> Ideally, each issue will be discussed as needed on the mailing list to
>> come to any consensus about what should be done to fix it, and then
>> the entry in the bug tracker may be used to keep it on the radar
>> screen, and to track activity related to it.
>>
>> Patches are *always* welcome. Patches that include testing of any new
>> features, or tests that prove a bug is really fixed on the dashboards
>> are better: a patch with testing is strongly preferred over a patch
>> with no testing. Also, if you are *adding* code, then you also
>> probably need to add *tests* of that code, so that the coverage
>> percentage stays as is or rises.
>>
>> Please discuss issues here on the mailing list as needed, and add
>> notes to existing issues in the bug tracker that you are interested in
>> seeing fixed for 2.8.7 -- we will be looking at activity both on the
>> mailing list and in the bug tracker to help prioritize the bug fixes
>> for the next couple months.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David Cole
>> Kitware, Inc.
>>
>>
>> P.S. - as a nice summary of what we accomplished in the CMake 2.8.6
>> release, including contributions from 27 individuals around the world,
>> see here: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/changelog_page.php?version_id=87
>> -- it currently lists 43 issues that we resolved: nice job, everybody!
>>
>> (Many of those were specifically addressed because somebody brought it
>> up in response to my similar email from just after 2.8.5... Don't be
>> shy!)
>> --
>>
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
>> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20111101/761b30bb/attachment.htm>