[vtkusers] [vtk-developers] Discussion: OK to change VTK's version number from 9.0 to 8.2?
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Thu Sep 27 23:15:17 EDT 2018
I'd like to see a BUILD_NUMBER encoded in the version.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 7:39 AM Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:33:19 +1200, Todd via vtk-developers wrote:
> > I have no objection, but I have to ask "What does the major version number
> > change mean? Does it signify breaking changes or the addition of new/removal of
> > old modules?"
> Even minor bumps could have added or removed modules. Major version
> bumps in the past have been gut feeling based on how much has changed
> since the last release (e.g., OpenGL2 backend, pipeline reworking,
> > In regards to some of the other feedback; the problem with month.year
> > versioning is that it represents nothing more than chronology. How would new/
> > deprecated features be signalled?
> Release notes. For VTK, even 8.1 to 8.2 meant some code likely had to
> change, so even minor bumps have not been indicative of "just recompile"
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
Unpaid intern in BillsParadise at noware dot com
More information about the vtkusers