[vtkusers] [vtk-developers] poll - vtk doxygen style

Michael Jackson mike.jackson at bluequartz.net
Mon Sep 19 15:27:44 EDT 2016


+1 for >
 >     /**
 >       * Document code
 >       * @param
 >       */

and leave them in the header file

-- 
Michael A. Jackson
BlueQuartz Software, LLC
[e]: mike.jackson at bluequartz.net


David Lonie wrote:
> One more vote for /** ... */ with leading * on lines in-between, and
> keeping the docs in the headers. Jumping to a header is much faster and
> easier than opening a doxygen page with modern IDEs. Plus, I doubt
> anyone would want to volunteer for the task of moving all the
> docstrings, and it doesn't sound easy to script/automate.
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Dan Lipsa <dan.lipsa at kitware.com
> <mailto:dan.lipsa at kitware.com>> wrote:
>
>     I also prefer this doxygen style:
>
>     /**
>       * Document code
>       * @param
>       */
>
>     as it creates a nice header for a function that contains the
>     documentation.
>
>     I think documentation should stay in the header as it is part of the
>     interface of the module.
>
>
>
>
>     On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Marcus D. Hanwell
>     <marcus.hanwell at kitware.com <mailto:marcus.hanwell at kitware.com>> wrote:
>
>         The Doxygen isn't always there, when I am hunting issues I often end
>         up in the header for the class thanks to my IDE, and having the
>         Doxygen there is often helpful whether the Doxygen is somewhere
>         on the
>         machine or not. I really dislike projects that put it in the
>         implementation, and disagree on the method names being enough. I
>         hope
>         we leave it in the headers, and for the purposes of the migration to
>         real Doxygen I am not sure the tools have the necessary logic to
>         move
>         documentation - just transform the style.
>
>         I prefer the
>
>         /**
>           * Document code
>           * @param
>           */
>
>         Style personally, but /// also works, never really liked the //!
>         but I
>         am sure I could adapt were that chosen.
>
>         On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:37 PM, David Cole via vtk-developers
>         <vtk-developers at vtk.org <mailto:vtk-developers at vtk.org>> wrote:
>          > Another argument for keeping all documentation in the header
>         files is so
>          > it's available in an install-tree-only situation. Some people
>         use VTK
>          > without the source tree around, and having the docs built
>         into the header
>          > files is quite nice in that scenario. If it were in the cxx
>         files, it
>          > wouldn't be available to such users.
>          >
>          >
>          > David
>          >
>          >
>          > On Sep 17, 2016, at 6:47 PM, David Thompson
>         <david.thompson at kitware.com <mailto:david.thompson at kitware.com>>
>          > wrote:
>          >
>          > Hi Andrew,
>          >
>          > ...
>          >
>          > For what it is worth, I also believe that documentation
>         should be with the
>          > declaration simply because the header files are the ones
>         people tend to
>          > first look at not the definition. This is what VTK currently
>         does. ...
>          >
>          >
>          > I think that moving method (not class) documentation out of
>         the headers
>          > makes the headers much more terse and legible. For the vast
>         majority of
>          > classes, the method names themselves are enough
>         documentation. In cases
>          > where method names are not enough, it is nice to have the
>         implementation
>          > nearby. Methods with inline or macro-generated
>         implementations would still
>          > have documentation in the header, as would enums.
>          >
>          >     David
>          >
>          > _______________________________________________
>          > Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>          >
>          > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>          > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>         <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>          >
>          > Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>          > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ <http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ>
>          >
>          > Search the list archives at:
>         http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>         <http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers>
>          >
>          > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>          > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>         <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers>
>          >
>          >
>          > _______________________________________________
>          > Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>          >
>          > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>          > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>         <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>          >
>          > Search the list archives at:
>         http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
>         <http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers>
>         >
>         >  Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>          > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>         <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers>
>         >
>         >
>         _______________________________________________
>         Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
>         Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>         http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>         <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>
>         Search the list archives at:
>         http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
>         <http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers>
>
>         Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>         http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>         <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>
>     Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>     http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>     <http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html>
>
>     Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
>     http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ <http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ>
>
>     Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>     <http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers>
>
>     Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>     http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>     <http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers


More information about the vtkusers mailing list