[vtkusers] [RFC] Renaming the 'vtk' binary

[David Gobbi]

Actually, it's "wish", not "tclsh".  My vote is for vtktcl.

 - David

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:05 AM, David Cole via vtkusers <vtkusers at vtk.org>
wrote:

> Consider "vtktclsh" so the python -> vtkpython analogy holds, too...
>
> i.e. vtktclsh is tclsh with built-in VTK access...
>
>
> David
>
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Andy Bauer <andy.bauer at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jorge Perez <josp.jorge at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I use vtk + TCL, the change makes sense.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > El 20/01/2016 20:43, "David E DeMarle" <dave.demarle at kitware.com>
>> escribió:
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me
>> >>
>> >> David E DeMarle
>> >> Kitware, Inc.
>> >> R&D Engineer
>> >> 21 Corporate Drive
>> >> Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
>> >> Phone: 518-881-4909
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>> Currently, there is a 'vtk' binary built when the Tcl bindings are
>> >>> enabled. In order to make it more obvious, it would be nice to rename
>> >>> this to 'vtktcl' (which matches the 'vtkpython' binary name). Similar
>> >>> for the 'pvtk' binary becoming 'pvtktcl'.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any objections?
>> >>>
>> >>> --Ben
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20160121/7cfc4a0f/attachment.html>