[vtkusers] K-means values
Sara Rolfe
smrolfe at u.washington.edu
Wed Mar 16 13:06:02 EDT 2011
It seems like I could solve this by using learning and specifying one
iteration, but this seems awkward. If anyone is aware of a better way
to access the means from the kMeansStatistics output, could you let me
know?
Thanks,
Sara
On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Sara Rolfe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Right now I'm using vtkKmeansStatistics
> without learning and am following the example here:
>
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK/Examples/InfoVis/KMeansClustering
>
> The output that I get using kMeansStatistics->GetOutput()->Dump()
> shows the original value, the distance to the nearest cluster, and
> cluster id it is assigned to, instead of the cluster mean.
>
> +-----------------+-----------------+------------------+
> | Magnitude | distance (0) | closest id (0) |
> +-----------------+-----------------+------------------+
> | 0.0657005 | 6.44972e-06 | 4 |
> | 0.0652216 | 4.24651e-06 | 4 |
> | 0.0646891 | 2.33557e-06 | 4 |
> | 0.0641142 | 9.08931e-07 | 4 |
> | 0.0635069 | 1.19747e-07 | 4 |
> | 0.0666587 | 1.2235e-05 | 4 |
>
> I think I will probably use learning, but I'd like to get it working
> without first.
>
> Thanks,
> Sara
>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Thompson, David C wrote:
>
>> Hi Sara,
>>
>>> I'm using vtkKmeansStatistics to successfully cluster data points.
>>> However, I'm missing how you access the actual cluster mean values,
>>> instead of just their labels. It looks like the order of the labels
>>> may not correspond to the values of the means, is this true?
>>
>> I'm not clear on what you mean by "label". I've run the filter on
>> data with 2 columns (named x & y) and with 2 sets of initial
>> cluster center coordinates specified on the LEARN_PARAMETERS input:
>> one for k=2 and one for k=3. I get this table:
>>
>> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------
>> +----------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> | Run ID | k | Iterations | Error
>> | Cardinality | x | y |
>> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------
>> +----------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1528.94
>> | 772 | 0.166201 | 0.12059 |
>> | 0 | 2 | 3 | 498.266
>> | 228 | 2.79467 | 2.99856 |
>> | 1 | 3 | 15 | 546.596
>> | 397 | -0.341883 | -0.486857 |
>> | 1 | 3 | 15 | 546.946
>> | 405 | 0.758854 | 0.855424 |
>> | 1 | 3 | 15 | 381.077
>> | 198 | 2.99941 | 3.14951 |
>> +----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------
>> +----------------+----------------+-----------------+
>>
>> as the first block of output 1 (i.e.,
>> GetOutputDataObject( 1 ).GetBlock( 0 ).Dump() will produce the
>> above). The first 2 rows contain the cluster mean values
>> corresponding to the run with k=2 and the final 3 rows have the
>> same for the run with k=3. Because there are 2 coordinates (x & y)
>> for each cluster center, there is no good way to order cluster
>> centers by their means. Instead, their order matches the initial
>> guesses at cluster centers specified on the LEARN_PARAMETERS input
>> if it exists. Otherwise, the order is random because the initial
>> guesses are produced randomly. Is this what you wanted to know?
>>
>> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20110316/1f652e40/attachment.htm>
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list