[vtkusers] Jacobi eigenvectors incorrect?
Bryn Lloyd
blloyd at vision.ee.ethz.ch
Fri Oct 30 09:05:02 EDT 2009
Hi David,
I get the same result, using my test code.
Matlab:
a = [1,2,3; 2,5,9; 3,9,8]
[v,w] = eig(a)
v =
0.1372 0.9644 0.2259
0.7382 -0.2516 0.6259
-0.6605 -0.0809 0.7464
w =
-2.6814 0 0
0 0.2266 0
0 0 16.4547
C++:
16.4547 0.225898 -0.964436 0.137232
0.226646 0.625927 0.251645 0.738167
-2.68139 0.746449 0.0808535 -0.660513
Both are the same, except the sign difference for (ordered) Eigenvector
2. Note that Matlab does not order them.
/Bryn
David Doria wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Fred Fred <stan1313 at hotmail.fr> wrote:
>> BTW, which is the easiest way to compute the real eigenvalues of a
>> non-symetric matrix in VTK? Of course such eigenvalues may not exist but in
>> case they exist, I wonder which is the better way to use.
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:39:34 -0400
>>> From: bill.lorensen at gmail.com
>>> To: daviddoria+vtk at gmail.com
>>> CC: vtkusers at vtk.org
>>> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] Jacobi eigenvectors incorrect?
>>>
>>> According to the documentation in vtkMath.cxx, the code
>>> vtkJacobiN finds the solution of an nxn real SYMMETRIC matrix.
>>> Can you try your tests with a symmetric matrix and compare the results
>>> between vtk and matlab.
>>>
>>> Bill
>
> I am still not getting the same evecs even with a symmetric matrix:
>
> #include "vtkMath.h"
>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> double *a[3];
> double a0[3];
> double a1[3];
> double a2[3];
> a[0] = a0; a[1] = a1; a[2] = a2;
>
> //set the matrix to all zeros
> for(unsigned int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> {
> a0[i] = a1[i] = a2[i] = 0.0;
> }
>
> /*
> 1 2 3
> 2 5 9
> 3 9 8
> */
> a0[0] = 1;
> a0[1] = 2;
> a0[2] = 3;
> a1[0] = 2;
> a1[1] = 5;
> a1[2] = 9;
> a2[0] = 3;
> a2[1] = 9;
> a2[2] = 8;
>
> // Extract eigenvectors from covariance matrix
> double *v[3];
> double v0[3];
> double v1[3];
> double v2[3];
>
> v[0] = v0; v[1] = v1; v[2] = v2;
> double eigval[3];
> vtkMath::Jacobi(a,eigval,v);
> vtkstd::cout << "eigvals: " << eigval[0] << " " << eigval[1] << " "
> << eigval[2] << vtkstd::endl;
> vtkstd::cout << "v0: " << v0[0] << " " << v0[1] << " " << v0[2] <<
> vtkstd::endl;
> vtkstd::cout << "v1: " << v1[0] << " " << v1[1] << " " << v1[2] <<
> vtkstd::endl;
> vtkstd::cout << "v2: " << v2[0] << " " << v2[1] << " " << v2[2] <<
> vtkstd::endl;
>
> vtkstd::cout << "Evec corresponding to smallest eval: " << v2[0] <<
> " " << v2[1] << " " << v2[2] << vtkstd::endl;
> return 0;
> }
>
> Here is the matlab:
>
>
> a=[1 2 3; 2 5 9; 3 9 8];
> [v d] = eig(a);
>
> The columns of V are the eigenvectors of a:
>
> v =
>
> 0.1372 0.9644 0.2259
> 0.7382 -0.2516 0.6259
> -0.6605 -0.0809 0.7464
>
> The output of my vtk c++:
> Evec corresponding to smallest eval: 0.746449 0.0808535 -0.660513
>
> I see this vector reversed in the bottom row of the matlab eigenvector
> matrix - is this a coincidence or am I misinterpreting the output from
> the Jacobi function and just getting these things in the wrong order?
> This is exactly what I was talking about when I suggested that we
> either reimplement or make a nice wrapper so that users can be sure
> what is going on - setting (r,c) type entries in a "matrix" and then
> getting "vectors" back instead of ** style arrays.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at: http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
--
-------------------------------------------------
Bryn Lloyd
Computer Vision Laboratory
ETH Zürich, Sternwartstrasse 7, ETF C110
CH - 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Tel: +41 44 63 26668
Fax: +41 44 63 21199
-------------------------------------------------
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list