[vtkusers] Sample code using VTK and DICOM
masabumi ishihara
maty.ishihara at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 05:41:29 EDT 2008
Hi Mathieu,
Thank you for your splendid opinion.
This time, we compareed two viewers' preformances.
Unfortunately, the results are as follows;
CPU rate
performance of moving
gdcmviewer with release mode 50~60% slow
our prototype viewer 50~60% real time
DICOM Data : LittleEndianExplicit 15,000 KB
Can you believe the above results?
Do you have any reason, e.g. memory sled ..., ?
Our prototype viewer is simple 2D viewer, which doesn't have any interface
to VTK, ITK GDCM.
Then, we would like to use the other viewer for the future.
But, it have to be real time operative.
Thanks,
Maty
2008/10/3 Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre at gmail.com>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:16 AM, masabumi ishihara
> <maty.ishihara at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> >> late ? do you mean slow ?
> >
> > I'm sorry, you are right.
> > I made a slight mistake.
> > Besides, I made another mistake, which is as follows;
> > (wrong) (right)
> > moving and zooming moving or zooming, respectively
> >
> >> gdcm is much faster in Release mode AFAIK since it remove the pre/post
> >> conditions written using asserts.
> >
> > Thanks. But, yesterday the DGCM Viwer I built with release mode was slow.
> > I'd like to try to rebuild with AFAIK .
> > Then, please tell me how to build with AFAIK .
>
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/AFAIK
>
> there should be no issue regarding speed on any medical image IMHO,
> since the size of image is small compared to average machine. You need
> to check your VTK setup, on linux for instance you could be using
> software rendering, check with your admin system.
>
> --
> Mathieu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20081003/6fd0f0c1/attachment.htm>
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list