[vtkusers] Delete vtkObjects

[Andi2008]

No, the DebugLeakReport appears when i close the application. Therefore i
just include the vtkDebugLeaks.h 

the method that instantiates and delete the surrounding class is called from
from a combobox and the whole method is:

void ImageCtrl::Init_3D(void)
{
	ImageVolumeData *vtkModul = new ImageVolumeData();

        delete vtkModul; 

	return;
}

The class ImageCtrl is derived from CCmdTarget and handles the
Messagerouting in the program.

I debugged thought the code and watched the ProcessExplorers
PrivateByteHistory of the running programm. I did the same in the
vtkexamples and there everything works fine. I know it sounds strange and
obviously it is a mistake on my side.

Does anybody has an idea
Andi 






David Cole wrote:
> 
> Where is your code that instantiates/deletes the surrounding C++ class?
> Are you saying that instantiating one of those and then deleting it
> results
> in a VTK mem leak report?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Andi2008 <mail-andi at web.de> wrote:
> 
>>
>> thank you for the quick answer.But my case is different. I fixed the
>> leaks
>> he
>> reported already by loading all vtl dlls delayed. I am using MFC too.
>> Visual
>> Studio report leaks only if i create vtkObjects.vtkDebugLeaks and the
>> fact
>> that the private byte history in the ProcessExplorer doesnt decrease
>> after
>> i
>> the objects tells me that the leaks come from vtk.
>>
>> I have no idea anymore what iam doing wrong.
>> Andi
>>
>>
>>
>> malat wrote:
>> >
>> > Andreas,
>> >
>> >   I you are using MFC, I suggest to read the following post:
>> >
>> > http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/2007-May/090968.html
>> >
>> >   The non-compiling example you posted looks fine to me.
>> >
>> > 2cts
>> > -Mathieu
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Andreas Brüning <mail-andi at web.de>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> yes it is me again and i still have questions about deleting
>> vtkobjects
>> >> :)
>> >> Regarding to my post from Aug/12:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/2008-August/096455.html
>> >>
>> >> i still have problems to delete vtkobjects in my program and it is not
>> >> only the thread issue. To encapsulate the whole vtk stuff i created it
>> in
>> >> a single class. I created some vtk objects in the constructor and call
>> >> the Delete() method in the destructor for testing. Than i created one
>> of
>> >> these class and delete  it while i checked the private bytes history
>> on
>> >> Sysinternals ProcessExplorer(which is by the way a great tool). I also
>> >> enabled VTK_DEGUG_LEAKS.
>> >> I thought when i delete the class the whole vtk stuff is gone but it
>> is
>> >> not. i can see no memory reduction in the process explorer and the
>> >> DebugLeaks MessageBox tells me that always the objects remains. When i
>> >> create a vtkPolyDataMapper there are even more. If i create more of my
>> >> vtkClasses there are no changes in the memory but the debugleaks
>> >> MessageBox report that all the vtkObjects remain in memory.
>> >>
>> >> I really have no idea where is the mistake. I did the same procedure
>> with
>> >> the vtkExamples and there everything is fine and the memory always
>> cleans
>> >> up. I compared the project properies and they are the same.
>> >>
>> >> Here is the code of my very short vtkClass:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> #include "StdAfx.h"
>> >>
>> >> #include "ImageVolumeData.h"
>> >>
>> >> #undef THIS_FILE
>> >> static char BASED_CODE THIS_FILE[]=__FILE__;
>> >>
>> >> #define new DEBUG_NEW
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ImageVolumeData::ImageVolumeData(void)
>> >> {
>> >>        vtk_importer = vtkImageImport::New();  //global Variables
>> defined
>> >> in the header
>> >>        vtkflipper = vtkImageFlip::New();
>> >>
>> >>        //debugger = vtkDebugLeaks::New();
>> >>        ren = vtkRenderer::New();
>> >>
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> ImageVolumeData::~ImageVolumeData(void)
>> >> {
>> >>        vtk_importer->SetImportVoidPointer(NULL,0);
>> >>
>> >>        vtkflipper->Delete();
>> >>        vtk_importer->Delete();
>> >>
>> >>        ren->Delete();
>> >>
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> I hope someone can give me an advice, i am running out of ideas
>> >>
>> >> Thanks in advance
>> >> Andi
>> >> _____________________________________________________________________
>> >> Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
>> >> http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=000000000066
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> This is the private VTK discussion list.
>> >> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
>> >> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> >> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mathieu
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > This is the private VTK discussion list.
>> > Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
>> > http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Delete-vtkObjects-tp18980765p18983087.html
>> Sent from the VTK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the private VTK discussion list.
>> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
>> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the private VTK discussion list.
> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Delete-vtkObjects-tp18980765p18984404.html
Sent from the VTK - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.