=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_[vtkusers]_R=E9f._:_vtkusers_Digest, _Vol_37, _Issue_25?=

[Berk Geveci]

Hi Stephane,

> distributedDataSet
>         *mesh0
>                 -part0
>                 -part1 = null
>         *mesh1
>                 -part0
>                 -part1 = null

Although both distributions would work, the one above is the
convention. I believe I talked about this in the November 2006 Kitware
Source (http://kitware.com/products/newsletter.html).

-berk


On 5/25/07, Stephane PLOIX <stephane.ploix at edf.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have some data that I would like to distribute over a cluster with a
> custom reader. My data is already a multi-bloc data, each bloc representing
> a different mesh (not related to each other) :
> dataSet
>         *mesh 0
>         *mesh 1
>
> I am wondering how I should created the distributed structure so that it
> works with the rest of the pipeline :
> for instance on proc0, should I have
> distributedDataSet
>         *mesh0
>                 -part0
>                 -part1 = null
>         *mesh1
>                 -part0
>                 -part1 = null
>
> or
> distributedDataSet
>         *part0
>                 -part0ofMesh0
>                 -part0ofMesh1
>         *part1 = null
>
> Thanks for any advice
>
> Stephane
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Stéphane Ploix
>  Ingénieur Chercheur EDF R&D - Sinetics
>  1 avenue du Général de Gaulle
>  F-91141 Clamart Cedex
>  Tél : 01 47 65 51 10
>  Messagerie : stephane.ploix at edf.fr
> _______________________________________________
> This is the private VTK discussion list.
> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
>


-- 
 Berk Geveci
 Kitware Inc.
 28 Corporate Drive
 Clifton Park, NY, 12065