[vtkusers] Subclassing vtkActor broken?

[stoptv]

On 4/18/06, Marc Cotran <marc at cotran.ca> wrote:
>
> I see what you're saying... Of course you *could* keep track of your
> actors in a "vtkActorToPigment" hash table. That way, when you pick you
> would find out if your hash table has a pigment for the picked actor...
> This would avoid subclassing vtkActor - but I guess you really want to
> subclass...


yes, I'd rather subclass.. pitty though.. even a single void* would have
saved my soul.
If only there was a way to attach arbitrary data to vtkObjects, I'd have my
acme hash table in no time ;-)

gl!
>
Thanks!

--
stoptv at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/attachments/20060418/07a8dfec/attachment.htm>