[vtkusers] Re: vtkTransform concatenation

[David Gobbi]

Hi Micheal,

There is an easy way around this, concatenate a matrix instead of
a transform.

When you do transform->Concatenate(matrix) you don't create a pipeline
connection.  So try transform->Concatenate(transform2->GetMatrix())

 - David


On Thu, 13 May 2004, Michael Halle wrote:

> For another transform question, is there a way to
> "flatten", "harden", or "evaluate" a concatenated transform
> so it is no longer dependent on its component transforms?
>
> I've used a single temporary transform to create several
> other transforms, and every time I reset the temporary
> transform ALL of my other transforms change.  Arg.
>
> Michael Halle
> mhalle - at - bwh.harvard.edu
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the private VTK discussion list.
> Please keep messages on-topic. Check the FAQ at: <http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/vtkfaq>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>