[vtkusers] difference amoung GetVolume , GetVolumeX, GetVolumeY, GetVolumeZ in vtkMassProperties class.

[rahul kumar]

Hi vtkusers,

could anybody tell me the difference amoung GetVolume
, GetVolumeX, GetVolumeY, GetVolumeZ in
vtkMassProperties class.

i searched whole archive but only i cud find some
unanswered queries like following
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtkusers/2000-April/000569.html.


thanks a lot.
regards 
rahul

 --- vtkusers-request at vtk.org wrote:
> Send vtkusers mailing list submissions to
> 	vtkusers at vtk.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 	http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	vtkusers-request at vtk.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	vtkusers-admin at vtk.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of vtkusers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: VTK + Windows -> Commerical App -
> Feasibility ?? (Ketan Mehta)
>    2. Re: VTK + Windows -> Commerical App -
> Feasibility ?? (Lisa Avila)
>    3. Re: VTK + Windows -> Commerical App -
> Feasibility ?? (Leila Baghdadi)
>    4. RE: VTK + Windows -> Commerical App -
> Feasibility ?? (Wen-Hsing Chiang)
>    5. How to loop around vtkAppendPolydata ? (tutu
> lamotte)
>    6. RE: How to loop around vtkAppendPolydata ?
> (Wen-Hsing Chiang)
>    7. RE: How to loop around vtkAppendPolydata ?
> (tutu lamotte)
>    8. Problem using Cmake (Radhika Sivaramakrishna)
>    9. Problems with CMake - continuation (Radhika
> Sivaramakrishna)
>   10. RE: VTK + Windows -> Commerical App -
> Feasibility ?? (Tom Citriniti)
>   11. help with vtk data structure! (susan)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:04:32 +0530
> From: Ketan Mehta <ketan.mehta at wipro.com>
> Organization: Wipro HS
> To: tparker at atlasbuilders.com, VTK-User
> <vtkusers at vtk.org>
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] VTK + Windows -> Commerical
> App - Feasibility ??
> 
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thanks a lot. I got something which I was looking
> for :)
> 
> Tom Parker wrote:
> > I've built the same app in AVS/Express and MFC/VTK
> and the VTK version has a
> > much lighter footprint.
> 
> Thanks for info.
>  
> > > 2) Speed seems to be slower.. same sort of 3D /
> 2D app with native
> > >       windows will be little faster than vtk
> based.
> > 
> > Wrong again, not to mention you don't have to wait
> on FlexLM to let your app
> >o water the garden or make a latte while
> > FlexLM decides to let me work.
> 
> I agree about license manager's and their issues :(.
> 
>  
> > > 3) MicroCT - App from GE is VTK+Windows and
> works too slowly!!
> > 
> > When performance has been an issue with deployed
> VTK apps the problem has
> > usually been a crap client machine. My clients are
> running on HP Viz
> > Stations or Dell desktops with geforce2 or better
> cards with no problem.
> 
> I agreee, since on my server machine : Dell
> Precision 650 : 2GB RAM, Nvidia 
> Quadro it worked fine.
>  
> > > 4) Not many people have used vtk directly for
> complete apps. It
> > >       has to be modified to great extent..
> > 
> > The other toolkits also require extensive
> modification for most commercial
> > projects. Apart from custom I/O routines we're
> using stock VTK and most of
> > the customization app work is in the MFC GUI.
> 
> This is very good information for me. Thanks a lot
> !!
>  
> > > Apart from this if there are any other input,
> please share it.
> > 
> > The sad truth is that AVS5, AVS/Express, OpenDX,
> PVWave, TGS only have one
> > or two developers maintaining them, if that! From
> the changelogs I've read
> > there are more people contributing to VTK than all
> the other Viz toolkits
> > put together.
> 
> I am surprised. Since sales pitch are very strong.
> 
> Just one question, which from your experience you
> can share. I am not able
> to understand the viz market. Since while comparing
> vtk with others, TGS
> etc were not coming winner and only VTK looked best
> if going for long term
> / short term gains.
> 
> Specific to medical, do you think offering from
> TerraRecon/Voxar are better ?
> What works best for any product development ?
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Tom
> > 
> > PS. VTK Rocks.
> Still baby to decide about it :)
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot
> Ketan
> 
>
**************************Disclaimer************************************
> 
> Information contained in this E-MAIL being
> proprietary to Wipro Limited is 
> 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use
> only by the individual
>  or entity to which it is addressed. You are
> notified that any use, copying 
> or dissemination of the information contained in the
> E-MAIL in any manner 
> whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
> 
>
***************************************************************************
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:16:28 -0400
> To: Ketan Mehta <ketan.mehta at wipro.com>,
> tparker at atlasbuilders.com,
> 	VTK-User <vtkusers at vtk.org>
> From: Lisa Avila <lisa.avila at kitware.com>
> Subject: Re: [vtkusers] VTK + Windows -> Commerical
> App - Feasibility ??
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
> 
> >Specific to medical, do you think offering from
> TerraRecon/Voxar are better ?
> >What works best for any product development ?
> 
> I am not familiar with Voxar so I cannot comment on
> it.
> 
> TeraRecon (as far as I understand their product
> line) offers complete 
> end-user solutions, not toolkits. The exception to
> this is VLI which is the 
> library they have to support their VolumePro boards.
> This is not a 
> "visualization" library, but rather a "volume
> rendering" library. It only 
> works on systems that have a VolumePro board. FYI -
> VTK has support for the 
> VolumePro too (although not as extensive as the
> support you can get from 
> using VLI directly - VTK supports with the VolumePro
> essentially the same 
> volume rendering you have with the ray caster or
> texture mapper, but not 
> some of the special features that are more unique to
> the VolumePro 1000).
> 
>  > I tested other native ( Win32, MFC and OpenGL )
> based apps with VTK
>  > examples and MicroCT app. ( Only one I could find
> build using VTK )
> 
> You can try downloading VolView 1.3 from the Kitware
> web 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com