[vtkusers] vtkAppendPolyData woes
Gerard Gorman
g.gorman at imperial.ac.uk
Sat Aug 9 09:39:23 EDT 2003
Thanks! That was exactly the problem. I had missed the importance of
maintaining a cell (VTK_VERTEX) when working with point data.
Thanks again for you help,
Gerard.
Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
>>>>>>"GG" == Gerard Gorman <g.gorman at imperial.ac.uk> writes:
>
>
> GG> Prabhu Ramachandran wrote:
> >> Perhaps adding an appendF.Update() before you get the output
> >> will help.
>
> GG> I'm afraid that it made no difference (see the change
> GG> below). For the curious I put two example polydata files in
> GG> at:
> GG> http://amcg.ese.ic.ac.uk/~gormo/sampleVTKFiles/tracers80.vtp
> GG> http://amcg.ese.ic.ac.uk/~gormo/sampleVTKFiles/tracers81.vtp
> GG> ...so just use the below script as ./test.py tracers80.vtp
> GG> tracers80.vtp
>
>>From what I can tell its your data thats incorrect. You need to
> specify the vertices. Without the vertices there is no "polydata",
> only points. For each point add a vertex and AFAIK it should work.
> Something like so:
>
> VERTICES 100 200
> 1 0
> 1 1
> 1 2
> ...
> 1 99
>
>
> cheers,
> prabhu
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Gerard Gorman (PhD Student)
Applied Modelling and Computation Group
Earth Science and Engineering
Imperial College
Prince Consort Road Tel. 00 44 +207 594 9323
London SW7 2BP Fax. 00 44 +207 594 9321
U.K. o~o A good slogan beats a good solution.
-----------------------w-v-w------------------------------
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list