[vtkusers] vtk on Mac OS X 10.2 and changes posted to CVS?

[William A. Hoffman]

The problem came from using the current cvs CMake.

As a rule for building VTK, folks should not try the cvs release of cmake.
The most current stable release should work for VTK.
There is no guarantee that the cvs version of cmake will be
able to build VTK, or even itself.


-Bill


At 09:51 PM 8/22/2002 -0400, Yves Starreveld wrote:
>Hi, Surajeet,
>
>I have not received 10.2 yet, but reports from our correspondent in Norway 
>indicate successful builds.
>
>What problems are you encountering?
>
>Yves
>On Wednesday, August 21, 2002, at 05:22 PM, nundys at mac.com wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>1)      I have successfully used vtk on Mac OS X 10.1 for some time now 
>>and am very happy with it.  I have tried to compile it on 10.2 (Jaguar) 
>>but am having trouble compiling cmake with gcc 3.1. Has anyone else had 
>>any success?
>>
>>2)    The changes posted by Raphael Sebbe:-
>>
>>http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtkusers/2002-July/012437.html
>>
>>are essential for an OS X/Carbon compile but haven't found their way into 
>>the CVS source tree yet.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Surajit Nundy
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the private VTK discussion list. Please keep messages on-topic. 
>>Check the FAQ at: <http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/vtkfaq>
>>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the private VTK discussion list. Please keep messages on-topic. 
>Check the FAQ at: <http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/vtkfaq>
>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers