[vtkusers] Re: RedHat 7.2 Mesa bug with VTK?

Dave Reed dreed at capital.edu
Thu Oct 25 22:01:24 EDT 2001


Compiled Mesa 4.0 in /usr/local/lib. Tried recompiling a vtk nightly
from July that I had been using --with-opengl (I seem to remember
reading that we should be using that now or should we use --with-mesa)
but I still get the holes in the polygon.

I didn't remove the Mesa-3.4.2 that RedHat put in /usr/lib, but 
ldd medical1 reports that it is using /usr/local/lib/libGL.so (which
is Mesa 4.0).

Any more suggestions?

Thanks,
Dave



> X-Sender: billlist at pop.nycap.rr.com
> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:14:04 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist at nycap.rr.com>
> Cc: vtkusers at public.kitware.com
> 
> First one is Mesa 4.0.   This was never a problem in VTK.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> 
> At 12:04 PM 10/25/2001 -0400, Dave Reed wrote:
> >> From: Prabhu Ramachandran <prabhu at aero.iitm.ernet.in>
> >> 
> >> >>>>> "BH" == Bill Hoffman <bill.hoffman at kitware.com> writes:
> >> 
> >>     BH> I think it will be fixed in 4.0.  We are running a dashboard
> >>     BH> now with the cvs version of Mesa and it now works.  There was
> >>     BH> a problem with Mesa that caused polygons to be dropped.  The
> >>     BH> problem is now fixed.  I just did a diff with the 4.0 tag and
> >>     BH> the current cvs, and there are no changes to the core library,
> >>     BH> so Mesa 4.0 should work well.  If you want to use Mesa from
> >>     BH> cvs for some reason, you can now check the vtk dashboard.  The
> >>     BH> build to look at is
> >> 
> >> Thanks for the update!  Will look forward to Mesa 4.0 then. :) Its
> >> interesting that both Mesa and VTK are at version 4. :)
> >> 
> >> prabhu
> >
> >Yes, I was confused by Bill's e-mail - did the the first 4.0 refer to
> >Mesa or VTK. 
> >
> >Mesa 4.0 has been officially released. I guess I'll download it and
> >try it when I find the time.
> >
> >Dave



More information about the vtkusers mailing list