[vtkusers] VTK24 vs. 312, quality and performance
Joey Mukherjee
joey at phobos.space.swri.edu
Thu Mar 22 16:56:53 EST 2001
> 1. SGI Dual Processor Octane, 1G memory, IRIX 6.5,
> VTK 2.4 compiled w/OpenGL.
>
> 2. Compaq Proliant, 2 450Mhz processors, 320M memory,
> RedHat Linux 7.0,
> VTK 3.1.2 compiled w/Mesa.
On the SGI, isn't the hardware acceleration taking effect even if you are
throwing your display?
>The first brings up the Interactor, and the second generates an animated
>gif file, showing the star rotating 360 degrees about its vertical axis.
>Here's the sizes of the two gif files, and as you can see, the one from
>VTK 3.1.2 is over 12 times the size of the gif from VTK 2.4:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 smitty mst 65589 Mar 22 14:06 star24.gif
> -rw-r--r-- 1 smitty mst 805580 Mar 22 13:29 star312.gif
Are you sure both are using the same version of convert with --enable-lzw
enabled?
FWIW, I noticed exactly the opposite effect. When I was using vtk2.4, it was
slower than the vtk3.2 I am using now, but this was on Sparcs.
Joey
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ Joey Mukherjee +
+ joey at swri.org "I intend to live forever, +
+ http://www.space.swri.edu/~joey so far, so good... +
+ +
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the vtkusers
mailing list