[vtk-developers] Lack of feedback during cache building

Bill Lorensen bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Fri Jan 11 14:27:01 EST 2019


Why cant we have a flag that will give the feedback we used to have? Or a
make variable?

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 11:06 AM Robert Maynard <robert.maynard at kitware.com
wrote:

> I personally like not seeing as few details as possible.
>
> Maybe just report what modules are enabled?
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:01 PM Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I like to see what modules might be excluded, etc. I'd like to see
>> something.
>>
>> Is this the consensus?
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 10:54 AM Ben Boeckel <ben.boeckel at kitware.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:31:32 -0800, Bill Lorensen wrote:
>>> > If the cache is rebuilt, I do not get and feedback. Just
>>> > Configuring done
>>> >
>>> > How to get the feedback we used to get?
>>>
>>> What benefit did you derive from it? I always saw it as a wall of noise,
>>> personally since it was unconditional and larger than a single screen
>>> anyways.
>>>
>>> I guess, what output should we be generating? For each bit: Should it be
>>> unconditional? If not, should it be on by default?
>>>
>>> --Ben
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> https://vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://vtk.org/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20190111/a795fd72/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the vtk-developers mailing list