[vtk-developers] Mummy project

David Cole DLRdave at aol.com
Tue Oct 10 11:06:31 EDT 2017


Sounds reasonable. I'm good with it wherever you decide to bring it
back to life on GitHub.

Thx,
D


On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2017 08:59 AM, David Cole wrote:
>> If gccxml is "dead" (long live gccxml...), then why put stuff which is
>> going to be updated to use CastXML underneath it?
>>
>> Seems like at least mummy should go with CastXML, or live under an
>> organization's main GitHub page rather than go under gccxml.
>
> pygccxml still lives under gccxml/ and is still maintained.
> All three tools are from the gccxml era and are part of its legacy.
>
> I'm not fully happy with CastXML being its own organization on
> GitHub.  The only reason it was done originally is so we could
> host a dedicated llvm/clang mirror with the patches we once needed
> for them before they were upstreamed.  I'd rather not expand it.
> One day CastXML may move.
>
> -Brad


More information about the vtk-developers mailing list