[vtk-developers] vtkAtomic vs std::atomic, can we change yet?
matt.mccormick at kitware.com
Mon Oct 2 17:34:07 EDT 2017
We switched to std::atomic in ITK 4.12.0 when available and have not
encountered any issues. And the RogueResearch dashboard builds are
much happier :-).
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Now that C++11 is required in VTK, could vtkAtomic switch to using std::atomic instead of the current 3 implementations (gcc atomics, Apple atomics, or Windows atomics)? Or are our minimum required environments not ready for that?
> I ask because the APIs currently used in the macOS case are deprecated, and thus it would be best to stop using them...
> Sean McBride, B. Eng sean at rogue-research.com
> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtk-developers
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
More information about the vtk-developers