[vtk-developers] int to bool patch, white space convention?
    Sean McBride 
    sean at rogue-research.com
       
    Tue Nov 17 10:19:50 EST 2015
    
    
  
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:56:56 -0500, Cory Quammen said:
>I commented on the gitlab issue, but I'll reiterate here. I'm worried about
>backwards incompatibilities this might introduce. In most cases, you should
>be fine. But I have suspicions things may be more complicated than they
>first appear.
Yes, it's a slight backwards compatibility break.  The last commit (of 4) shows the kind of compile issues that could result.  The biggest example is probably if you override the changed methods, you'd need your overrides to match signature.
It's a tradeoff.  We gain clearer code, better self-documentation, possibility of better compiler warnings (like SetBoolThing(123) could now warn).
>We'll need to test ParaView build with this change at the very least...
Thanks!
Sean
    
    
More information about the vtk-developers
mailing list