[vtk-developers] Python TestTemplates.py failing

[David Cole]

You'd probably have to modify the CDash at home script that gets sent down from the server. A VTK-project admin on CDash would need to do that.

You could either add "site-name-comparison" code, or a site-specific optional include file that would set EXCLUDE args for the ctest_test call.


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
To: David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com>
Cc: david.gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com>; vtk-developers <vtk-developers at vtk.org>
Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Python TestTemplates.py failing


So, Dave C, ctest sage, what is the magic to suppress a failure on a
given build machine?

Bill

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, we are very close to zero failures on two platforms. I'm hoping
> that David and Aashish can resolve those two in the next few days.
>
> The windows failures will have to be suppressed somehow for that
> platform. Those failures are hard to replicate on other similar
> platforms.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't know how to do that.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com> wrote:
>>> I would suggest excluding the remaining failing tests *just* from the gerrit
>>> builds until the tests are fixed.
>>>
>>> An even more effective way to get them fixed quickly would be to refuse
>>> approving any topics until all the gerrit tests are passing.
>>>
>>> We don't have to live with this.
>>>
>>>
>>> A non-green gerrit CDash build should be an automatic rejection.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>>> To: David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: VTK Developers <vtk-developers at vtk.org>
>>> Sent: Mon, Feb 4, 2013 3:01 pm
>>> Subject: Re: [vtk-developers] Python TestTemplates.py failing
>>>
>>> I'm concerned that gerrit reviewers are missing new failing tests
>>> because of recurrent failing tests. It is important to get the gerrit
>>> factory build failures to 0.
>>>
>>> Already this weekend, someone committed a patch that introduced a new
>>> recurring failure.
>>>
>>> It has been failing since mid-October.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:46 PM, David Gobbi <david.gobbi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com
>>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we suppress this until you can get to it? It is one of two
>>>>> tests failing on the gerrit ubuntu build.
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't consider that to be sufficient reason to suppress it.
>>>> It's a valid failure, not caused by hardware- or platform-specific
>>>> issues.  It should not be suppressed just to make the dashboard
>>>> green.  I'll find a few hours this week to work on it.
>>>>
>>>>  - David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.vtk.org/mailman/listinfo/vtk-developers
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
>
>
>
> --
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/vtk-developers/attachments/20130204/8efd5408/attachment.html>